British Home Secretary Amber Rudd has accused WhatsApp of giving terrorists "a place to hide," after the company has failed to comply with a demand to hand over the last messages sent by London attacker, Adrian Ajao, the Telegraph reports.
"This terrorist sent a WhatsApp message, and it can't be accessed," Rudd said. She also said that it is completely unacceptable for end-to-end encryption to be offered because there should be no place for terrorists to hide.
"We need to make sure that organizations like WhatsApp - and there are plenty of others like that - don't provide a secret place for terrorists to communicate with each other," she added.
The British authorities are complaining that Scotland Yard and the security services cannot access encrypted messages sent via WhatsApp, so they cannot know who Ajao contacted or what the told them before the attack.
Not only did Rudd slam WhatsApp, but also went after Google and social media platforms which have been known for being late to take down extremist material or refusing to take it down altogether due to their protection of "free speech" and the way their Terms are worded.
A much-desired backdoor
This isn't the first time, nor will it be the last time, when WhatsApp and other similar services, as well as encrypted email tools, are slammed by authorities. End-to-end encryption is supposed to protect users from hackers, but also mass-surveillance, such as that exposed by Edward Snowden's NSA files.
The way it works, a message is encrypted the second it is sent by one user, and it only gets decrypted once it reached the recipient. In this way, WhatsApp doesn't have access to any plain-text messages, which means it cannot share anything with authorities.
In recent months there have been more and more voices asking for encryption backdoors for authorities, something that tech companies will likely never agree to; not without losing users in droves.